A friend emailed me recently with a list of his favorite movies. We’re both movie fanatics, so I understand the impulse to make such a list, and I appreciate receiving it. I like to peruse other people’s favorite movie lists for films I might like to see, especially if the writer is a critic I admire or a friend with either similar or admirable taste. So I feel compelled to warn people that my own list, posted below for your perusal, is not useful in the same way.
I have to admit I would hesitate to recommend some of the movies on my own list. First of all, some of my favorite movies come from critically despised genres. Zoolander, for instance, is intentionally stupid. I like it because I like really stupid comedies, and in the stupid comedy genre it shines, at least for me. Other movies are favorites because they appeal to me for personal reasons or because of excellent cinematography. Signs is not even director M. Night Shyamalan’s best movie, and while I love the movie I don’t care so much for the ending, even though the ending is probably supposed to be the profound part. The first two Batman movies are simple action-hero stories, but I had trouble not adding even more Tim Burton movies for the same reason: I love the way his movies look.
On the other hand, I intentionally didn’t add many critically acclaimed movies to the list because, however much I admire them, they just aren’t my faves. I admire Citizen Kane, for instance - what serious film snob doesn't? - but I don’t enjoy watching it all that much, probably for the very reasons it’s such a remarkable movie. Citizen Kane is complex, even at the technical level, and that makes it difficult for me to simply sit back and enjoy it without analyzing it to death.
As for a movie like The Birds, a film most people would acknowledge as excellent, Hitchcock obviously made better movies. But I must have been about eight years old the first time I saw The Birds on TV, and not only did it scare the crap out of me as a kid, it left a lasting impact. It’s impact changes depending on my age, but every time I’ve watched it since, it seems a different and remarkable movie. It's also no coincidence that many parts of Signs can be viewed as a tribute to The Birds.
In short, my list of favorite movies is in no way equivalent to the movies I would put on a list of the most excellent movies, and I don’t necessarily claim to love each of them for rational reasons. Actually, my admiration for these movies isn’t even internally consistent. For instance, some of the movies on my list are complex, like Citizen Kane, but somehow they still grab me and engage me in a way that Citizen Kane cannot.
One last warning for anyone who might want to see some of these movies. I’m not even willing to stick by my list, or at least not for much longer than a day. Some of these movies, like The Birds and The Wizard of Oz, I’ve liked since I was a kid, and I will no doubt still love them years from now. Others I began to doubt shortly after adding them to the list. I saw Y Tu Mama Tambien for the first time quite recently, and I’m not yet sure if it’s one of my favorite movies of all time or just another excellent movie from Alfonso Cuaron. So here is my list, which simply shows my favorite movies as of March 1, 2008.
The Wizard of Oz
Wings of Desire
Eyes Wide Shut
Mr. Death: The Rise and Fall of Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.
Wild at Heart
Fast, Cheap and Out of Control
Mountains of the Moon
Dersu Uzala
Dreams
Say Anything
Moulin Rouge
The Grifters
The Shining
Breakfast at Tiffany's
The Birds
Nights of Cabiria
Y Tu Mama Tambien
A Little Princess
True Romance
Dark City
Signs
Batman I and II
Edward Scissorhands
The Fisher King
American Beauty
Zoolander
Prospero's Books
Ghostdog
Night on Earth
Children of Heaven
Terminator 2
Aliens
The Quiet Earth
Shaun of the Dead
Donnie Darko
6 comments:
First, a question - is the list in any particular order? Second, a comment - the movie about brother Uzala was so sad that we can't believe that it made the list. Are you one of those people who focus on the cinematography and "artistic value" over the story? “Ghostdog” is, of course, a classic. Finally, we were saddened to see that neither “Apocalypse Now”, nor “Top Gun” made the cut. Are you going soft?
Hey M.H. No, the list isn't in any particular order.
I have to agree that Dersu Uzala is so sad I can hardly take it. But I own a copy and love it anyway, for all sorts of strange personal reasons.
I should have added "Apocalypse Now" to my list, but it's interesting to me that you mention it in such close proximity to your question about cinematography and artistic value. I don't want to wreck the film for anyone, least of all you, M.H., but I would argue that A.N. has both qualities in excess. It's a movie that I actually disliked the first time I saw it. But it grew on me because it's so damned thought-provoking, among other attractions.
P.S. If you haven't seen the director's cut, don't. I think it's horrible. I now believe that the film editor is as responsible for the brilliance of A.N. as anyone else.
I think you bring up an important point. There's a tremendous distincition between "the best films ever made" and "films I actually like to watch over and over again." Citizen Kane is a good example, but the one that always comes to me is Raging Bull. I had film major friends in school who said it's the best American film of all time, and it may be, but it's emotionally draining and not something I can watch more than every five years or so. (Same with a Street Car Named Desire and Long Day's Journey into Night and other gloomfests). That being said, I can't watch disposable films over and over because they don't have enough to stand up. Dumbness is an attribute that can make for watchability. Zoolander is a good choice for dumb films, but I would also mention Austin Powers. If only there were a way to edit Austin Powers 1 and 2 into one film so it would only count as one...
Being a guy I'd have to add the Godfather 1 and 2 (which really is one film if you think about it), Goodfellas, A Bronx Tale, The Royal Tenenbaums, and Billy Elliot. There are bound to be others, but being the Beer Guy, it means I need to mull it over with a pint....
Opulently I to but I about the collection should secure more info then it has.
My life can be measured in hours;
I serve by being devoured.
Thin, I am quick; fat, I am slow.
Wind is my foe.
What am I?
A candle...
Post a Comment